Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Gea vs Trevor Svajda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gea vs Svajda analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Gea vs Trevor Svajda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gea 0 - 0 Svajda
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gea has won 46.42% of points on their second serve, while Svajda has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gea, in recent form, has won 54.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Svajda has won 51.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.21% and 34.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gea has saved 54.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Svajda has saved 60.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gea has won 61.9% of matches played (W/L 39/ 24), with Svajda winning 57.14% (W/L 12/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gea has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 83% (W/L 20/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Svajda has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 18/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gea has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 17/ 17), where as Svajda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 8/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gea has played against opponents with an average rank of 199.78 while Svajda has played against players with an average rank of 144.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gea has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Svajda has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gea has converted 50.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Svajda has converted 46.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
376
Rank
376
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
662
Rank
662
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
58% (57-42)
Career Total W/L
58% (18-13)
54% (19-16)
YTD W/L
64% (9-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Gea | Trevor Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (19/16) | 64% (9/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (44/37) | 60% (18/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (381/351) | 53% (152/135) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (16/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 110 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:41 | 1:33:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 191.74 | 167.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1538/2404) | 55% (520/940) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (997/1538) | 68% (354/520) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (402/866) | 50% (210/420) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (123/242) | 46% (44/95) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1005/2340) | 42% (384/914) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (16/12) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 86% (6/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (18/34) | 62% (8/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (5/13) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (19/16) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 29% (7/2) |
Arthur Gea Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Jerome Kym
Player
Arthur Gea
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
94)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
49%
(
51 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Michael Agwi
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Arthur Gea
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Sandro Kopp
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
114)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
47 of
78)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Arthur Gea
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Arthur Gea
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Arthur Gea
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Ignacio Buse
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Fernando Romboli
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Trevor Svajda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Trevor Svajda
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Trevor Svajda
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Andres Martin
50%
(
45 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Samir Banerjee
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Karue Sell
53%
(
52 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
57%
(
27 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Omni Kumar
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Emile Hudd
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Trevor Svajda
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gea Vs Svajda Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gea are available here and Svajda photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Arthur Gea
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
